I found this chapter on developing writing
assignments very helpful. She begins by saying “Because each composition
represents a response to a specific “invitation” to write, the problem in many
papers may be the fault, not of the writer, but of the assignment” (213). This
point cannot be emphasized enough. For me, when I was teaching high school it
was a trial and error process. I wished I had Lindemann’s advice back then, as
it would have saved me a great deal of grief. For me, I was always in a rush to
get my students to start writing that I did not often give my assignments the
meticulous thought and preparation that it required. When this happens, as
Lindemann also remarks, it causes confusion and does not yield the type of
products the teacher wants. The most important aspect of developing writing
assignments is to “encourage students to define progressively more complex
rhetorical problems” (215). Hence, students should not be given the same types
of assignments over and over again. I agree that when we don’t give students a
rhetorical problem to tackle, that we are indeed wasting students’ time as they
grapple with instead a “paper-writing problem” (215). Even though a knowledge
of process pedagogy is important, I feel that this chapter is also of paramount
importance because without effective writing assignments, students would not
get practice in rhetoric and composition.
No comments:
Post a Comment