My teaching philosophy is thought for an adult ESL classroom. Its core principles are supported by the
principles I’ve learned so far in my teaching composition class, but also, by
my ESL personal learning experience. I believe that language instructors should
be aware of language sensitivity. As
points out by Lindemann in chapter thirteen, (Developing Writing Assignments), it
is important to know students to anticipate possible problems that may arise in
the process of developing a story/narrative.
In this sense, I expect to be working in the ESL classroom
environment. You cannot teach creative
writing to ESL students, if I'm not wrong, but, I can teach them how to use
inventiveness and their imagination to describe or narrate stories, through which
they may reflect their own lives experiences.
When I think ESL, I think on individualizing topics. For example, if Maria likes nature, well, she
can write about going to a park experience.
Giving students the opportunity to decide what to write is a way of
guiding them through the writing though process and promoting creativity,
regardless of their academic level. I
just cannot hold it! I need to say it again, going back to my junior college
experience, I wished I'd had a teacher to teach me and guide me. She just assigned general topics, for
example, about the "social and economic issues," that were going on
at the time. Well, the topic sounds very
pretentious, but I was just a newly ESL learner, how in the world I could've
been able to write, or even make comments on such a topic. Lindemann suggests that assignments should
assess what students can DO or what they KNOW.
Of course, my teacher probably assumed that all students in the
classroom had the specialized knowledge regarding US social and economic issues
to write a persuasive argument. On the
other hand, the assignment topic wasn't appealing at all, why, because I was completely
unfamiliar with the cultural context and have no idea about what was going on
in the US society. I certainly believe
that she should've presented a list of choices created through a class
discussion, then, students could pick what best matches their interests. I just don't even know why I’m writing about
that experience, but, I do know that it left a strong mark, which it's still
showing on my transcripts. But, I cannot
explain it to academic authorities that I was never offered a simple writing
guideline. I'm very positive that
Lindemann was completely unfamiliar to her and that effective teaching may include
integrating or adjusting school/college curricula to the needs of students was an
unthinkable concept. I understand that
for some teachers doing so may be impossible, as I noticed, while I was working
on one of my teaching methodology assignments.
It happened at an ESL program for adult learners at Torrance Unified
School District. I noticed that the
teacher was using a textbook that was beyond of being the right book for the
level he was teaching. Anyway, I
commented, that, to my perception the book was to advance for that level, then,
he explained that he didn't have a voice to suggest changes to the course. I don't want to work for a school like that,
but, for a school that allows flexibility concerning students' learning needs.
OK, also useful for your teaching philosophy. I particularly like the idea of class-generated prompts. And the notion that ESL students are expected to solve social/economic problems in a social/economic environment they are just beginning to learn is ludicrous.
ReplyDeletePossible suggestion for prompt: Based on what You know about the US so far, what would you convey to a typical American about your own country, and the way you yourself are as a result of growing up there?